*laughs aloud in GLEE*
Nov. 5th, 2008 10:12 pm:D! Oh man, I was SO GLAD to see the news - way earlier today - but I can hardly say I was surprised by the result ;)
(Best Facebook status yet: McCain't. I heard someone mention it on the car radio as I was coming home tonight, and I couldn't help laughing out loud. ♥)
(Granted, I might have been the tiniest bit giddy about the whole thing. And a little dead tired too, I guess?)
The one thing I was REALLY worried about was California's referendum - but it sounds like it's not definitive? Eh? Eh? Say yes?
It's about time to start posting the livelongnmarry pics, I think... ;) I'd had in mind to start before the referendum itself, as something of a "good luck" thing, but. Haha. Nope, didn't happen.
(Best Facebook status yet: McCain't. I heard someone mention it on the car radio as I was coming home tonight, and I couldn't help laughing out loud. ♥)
(Granted, I might have been the tiniest bit giddy about the whole thing. And a little dead tired too, I guess?)
The one thing I was REALLY worried about was California's referendum - but it sounds like it's not definitive? Eh? Eh? Say yes?
It's about time to start posting the livelongnmarry pics, I think... ;) I'd had in mind to start before the referendum itself, as something of a "good luck" thing, but. Haha. Nope, didn't happen.
no subject
on 2008-11-05 09:30 pm (UTC)OMG livelongandmarry pics! I don't know how you could make this day better but if you put those up sometime this could be the best week EVER!
no subject
on 2008-11-05 10:13 pm (UTC)And, Kasche, please post your pics!
no subject
on 2008-11-05 10:12 pm (UTC)(and of course, OBAMA!!)
no subject
on 2008-11-05 11:03 pm (UTC)If it passes, and I'm afraid it will (they are still counting votes) the next step is to find grounds on which it is unconstitutional- like laws to the rights of privacy or the full faith right, which means one state must honor the laws of another state. So we make an argument about it violating law x and it begins to move up the court chain- CA state supreme court (who were the ones who initially deemd the 2000 CA gay marriage ban unconstitutional and thus why people could marry for a few months this year) and then to appeals, most likely- all the way to the Supreme Court. Like I was telling Ni, hopefully, at that point a few years from now, we will have a different makeup to the US Supreme Court OR there will be legislation for civil unions- and in time the language of 'civil unions' might change to 'marriage'.
Progress is coming. There is no way to stop it now. But it's going to take some time.
no subject
on 2008-11-06 12:13 am (UTC)I'd argue that a ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment (which has been cited in sex discrimination cases) and under Loving v. Virginia. The decision specifically addresses arguments that the right to marry is not being restricted because whites can marry whites and blacks can marry blacks - it says that that's BS. Logically, the same should apply to sex.
no subject
on 2008-11-06 01:13 am (UTC)I hope that this is only the loss of a battle and not the war. I'm also hopeful that our generation is one that breaks down this wall, just as my mom's did for 50s/60s civil rights.
no subject
on 2008-11-06 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
on 2008-11-06 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
on 2008-11-06 11:40 pm (UTC)And Obama, Obama, OBAMA!!! I'm still euphoric. I've been working for so long to be able to see this, and even though I never allowed myself to think it wouldn't happen, the actual occurrence is breathtaking.
no subject
on 2009-01-18 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
on 2009-01-18 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-01-18 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2009-01-18 05:22 pm (UTC)And hahaha, that's not possible, by the way. ;D